Artikel

Monitoring the quality and quantity of urban green space in Amsterdam with remote sensing and truth ground measurements

A case study on the mitigation of air pollution and the urban heat island effect by urban parks during a heatwave in Amsterdam

The continued development of cities will increasingly shape human well-being, considering more than two thirds of the global population is expected to live in cities by 2050. The consequences of urban densification endanger the liveability of cities, because it is associated with an increase in environmental threats like the urban heat island (UHI) effect and air pollution. Fortunately, urban green space can be used as a solution to mitigate the UHI effect and air pollution. Therefore this study focuses on developing a method to accurately monitor the quantity of urban green space in Amsterdam and assesses the quality of urban green space by exploring the ability of urban parks to lower temperatures and improve air quality.

The monitoring method was developed by using remote sensing, very high-resolution (VHR) satellite imagery and machine learning. Three classification models (Decision Tree, Random Forest and XGBoost) were used to classify urban land cover in Amsterdam. All the models achieved an overall accuracy of 90%, but the Random Forest classifier achieved the highest overall accuracy with 99%. Correctly distinguishing urban green space from other land cover classes was also achieved, because green space was classified correctly in all cases by the Random Forest classifier. The quality was assessed with a case study that measured the difference in temperature and air quality between parks and a built-up area in Amsterdam. The results show that urban parks can function as urban cool islands during a heatwave. While the definition of a heatwave applied to the built-up area, it did not apply to the parks. Temperatures were between 3.8 °C and 5.8 °C lower in the parks than in the built-up area during the heatwave. Air pollution was worse during the heatwave than during average weather conditions, but was not worse in parks than in the built-up area. The traffic intensity of nearby roads most likely was the source of air pollution. The parks were not able to function as islands of clean air at the scale of this study.

Author: Florence van der Hoven

Media

Documenten